Eighty-Eight Percent of Missourians Have Health Insurance

Recently released data from the US Census
Bureau's “Income,
Poverty, and Health Insurance
Coverage in the United States: 2005" indicates
that over
88 percent of all Missourians surveyed
over a three-year period have health
insurance
coverage. That’s above the national average of
just over
84 percent.
Missouri ranked 16th among all the states plus the
District of
Columbia in its percentage of people
with health insurance
coverage from 2003 to 2005.
Last was Texas, at 75 percent; first, Minnesota,
91 percent.
In general, the Midwest and Northeast ranked high in percentage of people with health insurance, and the West (with the exception of Hawaii) and South did not. The Midwest's uninsured rates in 2005 was 11.9, and that of the Northeast 12.3.
The Midwest had 10 states in the top 20; the Northeast eight. With the exception of the Aloha State, not one Western or Southern state even cracked the top 20.
|
Average, 2003-2005, Health Insurance |
|
|
State |
Percentage |
|
Minnesota |
91.3 |
|
Hawaii |
90.5 |
|
Iowa |
90.2 |
|
Wisconsin |
89.7 |
|
Maine |
89.6 |
|
New Hampshire |
89.6 |
|
Massachusetts |
89.3 |
|
Vermont |
89.3 |
|
Kansas |
89.1 |
|
Connecticut |
89 |
|
Rhode Island |
89 |
|
North Dakota |
88.8 |
|
Pennsylvania |
88.8 |
|
Michigan |
88.7 |
|
Nebraska |
88.6 |
|
Missouri |
88.1 |
|
Ohio |
88 |
|
South Dakota |
87.9 |
|
Delaware |
87.3 |
|
District of Columbia |
86.5 |
Missouri Compared
Missouri also
fared well compared to neighboring states.
Among its neighbors, only Iowa,
Kansas and Nebraska had higher rates of insurance coverage;
Oklahoma, at 80 percent, was fourth worst in the country.
|
Average, 2003-2005, Health Insurance Coverage, Mo. and Neighbors |
|
|
State |
Percentage |
|
Iowa |
90.2 |
|
Kansas |
89.1 |
|
Nebraska |
88.6 |
|
Missouri |
88.1 |
|
Kentucky |
86.4 |
|
Tennessee |
86.3 |
|
Illinois |
85.8 |
|
Arkansas |
82.8 |
|
Oklahoma |
80.5 |
Bigger Is Not Better
The report further indicates that larger states
do not necessarily have higher rates of insurance. The tiny District
of Columbia, for example, ranked 20th in the three-year
average, with over 86 percent. That’s well above the rankings of such
large-population states as New York (24th), Illinois (27th), New
Jersey (30th) and Florida (49th).
Even states with recent population and economic growth such as Georgia, Colorado and Nevada ranked poorly. California, the most populous state and the state with the largest gross state product by far ($1.47 trillion in 2005) was fifth worst, with only about 81 percent of its population covered by health insurance.
The study does not attempt to explain this phenomenon, but income disparity may be a root cause.
Race and Income
The number of
people with health insurance coverage in the entire United States
increased from 245.9 million in 2004 to 247.3 million in 2005, says
the report. In 2005, 46.6 million people were without health
insurance coverage, up from 45.3 million people in 2004.
Fifteen percent of whites were without health insurance coverage in 2005, compared to 19.6 of blacks and 17.9 percent of Asians. Lack of health insurance is also far more prevalent in lower- than in upper-income households. Almost a quarter of households earning less than $25,000 a year in household income have no health coverage, compared to less than 10 percent of households earning more than $75,000 annually.
|
Individuals without Health Insurance by Household Income |
|
|
Income |
Percent |
|
>$25,000 |
24.4 |
|
$25,000-49,999 |
20.6 |
|
$50,000-74,999 |
14.1 |
|
$75,000+ |
8.5 |
Meanwhile, the nation’s official poverty rate remained statistically unchanged from 2004 to 2005 at 12.6 percent.
Source: US Census
Bureau, “Income,
Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2005”